The Appeals Committee of the Ghana Football Association
(GFA) opened the eyes of the football populace when they delivered what has
been variously described as a very erudite verdict in the Hearts-Kotoko tussle
over the eligibility of striker, Obed Owusu in the August 2, First Capital Plus
Premier League match at the Accra Sports Stadium.
Kotoko won the game 2-1. Hearts subsequently protested
claiming that, the Kotoko striker was unqualified for the match, having received
a yellow card suspension. Kotoko challenged Hearts’ stance, insisting that,
Obed Owusu was fielded in an Elite Cup match prior to their encounter for which
reason his ineligibility had long been annulled.
The Disciplinary Committee of the GFA saw little or no
wisdom in the argument advanced by Kotoko. They ruled on September 1 that, matches
in the Elite Cup competition were not official. As a result, Kotoko was wrong in
using an Elite Cup match, to as it were, cancel Obed Owusu’s yellow card
suspension. Kotoko were declared losers against Hearts and also docked three
more points to serve as punishment besides a GHȼ5,000 fine.
The case didn’t end there. Kotoko headed straight to the
Appeals Committee, who after weeks of hard work, upheld Kotoko’s case,
maintaining that matches in the Elite Cup are official. They argued that the
Disciplinary Committee was wrong in declaring Hearts winners of the August 2
game. The other three-point’s deduction and the GHȼ5,000 fine was also
reversed.
“Having considered the
various definitions ascribed to official matches we cannot but to conclude that
the Elite Clubs Cup Competition matches are for all intents and purposes
official matches of the FA. In the
circumstances, the Elite Clubs Cup match played between Kotoko and Dunkwa
United was an official match. Obed Owusu having sat out in that particular
match has therefore satisfied article 39(5) (a) (v) of the General Regulations
of the FA.
“We therefore hereby
uphold the appeal filed by Kotoko and overturn the decision of the Disciplinary
Committee dated 1st September, 2015. The results of the match in question stand
undisturbed. The six points deducted from the accumulated points of Kotoko is
hereby restored and Hearts remains the loser of the said match. The GH¢5,000.00
fine awarded against Kotoko is also vacated”.
The ruling by the Appeals Committee has since been hailed
in different quarters. I know why. If the committee’s job was simply to hand Kotoko
back their hard earned points to bring them to their meritorious second
position on the 2014/15 First Capital Premier League table and send Hearts back
to their unenviable 13th position, I think, the GFA’s appellate body would
have attracted so much scorn.
But wait, the Appeals Committee are being praised for upholding
the truth and justice and the manner in which they did it shows their level of
maturity and deep-seated appreciation of law. Only simple minds and fanatics interested
in ranting and raving on radio without giving themselves to the impeccable
legal wisdom will find fault with the Appeals Committee verdict.
A careful reading of the ruling by the Appeals Committee
shows that, they weren’t only determined to cure the illogicality created by
the Disciplinary Committee’s definition of what an official match is. I believe
the Appeals Committee were also concerned with the potential chaos the
Disciplinary Committee ruling could leave our football in future.
The hypothetical situation they cited and the
accompanying cogent analysis they made in the ruling brings me to the firm
conclusion that, the Appeals Committee did diligent work. Matches in the Elite
Cup couldn’t have been unofficial in the situation where Special Rules had been
created for it by the FA in acknowledgement of its complexity and novelty.
I made this point in practically every media commentary with
the full conviction that, it was completely absurd for the Disciplinary
Committee to assume that matches in a competition of the nature of the Elite
Cup could be derogatorily termed friendly.
The Appeals Committee hasn’t only educated football fans with
facts. They have also shared the sort of legal sense that must permeate our
game to save it from illogicalities capable of killing interest in domestic
football. The Appeals Committee’s verdict is one that must be kept. The verdict
must be kept to guide us all that nothing should be made to stand in our game
if it has no reasonable basis. I doff my hat for the Appeals Committee.
No comments:
Post a Comment